Home Keep Me Posted
Finances Technology Employment Practices Merger Fact Check

Related Posts

Stay Connected

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSS

Search

Click here to Search this site

Sprint opposes a merger that will be in the best interest of American consumers, workers, and the public.  Sprint argues that the reason for their opposition is to protect free-market competition.   But, while the corporation is claiming that an AT&T/T-Mobile merger would lead to a duopoly between AT&T and Verizon, Sprint is publicly touting that they are a strong player in the market and, in fact, that their strength is improving – and its future business plans show that as well. 

Sprint’s Finances at a Glance

Sprint is working to improve its standing in the wireless market and taking steps to ensure a viable future for its own bottom line – regardless of its competition.  Two examples of this are its recent announcement that it is making large investments in their wireless networks and its upcoming sale of the iPhone 5. [NextBigFuture, 12/6/10; Wall Street Journal, 8/23/11]

Sprint’s failure to make significant investments in capital expenditures over the last four years is harmful to its current and future customers, and the question must be asked: will it be the customers who ultimately pay to help Sprint catch up?  Between 2007 and the first-quarter of 2011, Sprint Nextel invested nearly $10 billion less than the average telecommunications companies – more than $7 billion less than the average of its peers related to its wireless operations.  [U.S. Telecom Capital Investment Review, Fitch Ratings, 8/11/11]